23:07

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

Masts for 25kV Overhead Wires.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12th May 2006, 21:22
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Masts for 25kV Overhead Wires.

In Staff2600's great pic of "Tangmere" there is a latticework overhead gantry mast. I know that this design of mast is not new but they do appear to be getting more and more common on the West Coast Main Line. Does anyone know the reason for their increased useage. Can they really be cheaper than 2 separate masts or is there a more technical reason?

John.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16th May 2006, 19:19
Shed Cat's Avatar
Shed Cat Shed Cat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 1,100
Images: 46
With my (non-rail) civil-engineer hat on. The benefit of only having a single foundation for the gantry is that you dont have the problem of getting the distance exactly right between two foundations on either side of the track. Or, you have to make every gantry unique to span the varying distance across the tracks.

Or you have to put up separate single pylons for every track with all that extra digging and moving cables and drains out of the way

Also - foundations are expensive, but the extra steel work is relatively cheap. So while you may not save on cost overall, it may not be that much more expensive.

Just a guess.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th May 2006, 20:30
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Thanks for your ideas Shedcat
I wouldn't mind betting that cost as opposed to technical requirement comes into it somewhere
These single foundation structures always look "top heavy" to me
John.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th May 2006, 20:42
Shed Cat's Avatar
Shed Cat Shed Cat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 1,100
Images: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by swisstrains
I wouldn't mind betting that cost as opposed to technical requirement comes into it somewhere
These single foundation structures always look "top heavy" to me
John.
You are right, they are top heavy and inefficient. So, for someone to decide that building them that way is the cheapest solution, there must be a different more critical problem they are trying to overcome. I can only think foundations, or possibly the hassle of trying to obtain Posessions on two tracks is so bad, that it is better to build from one side only.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27th April 2009, 22:25
klordger1900's Avatar
klordger1900 klordger1900 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 732
Images: 27
You ask a simple question and before you know it - I need a science degree!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:07.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.