15:50

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

New Diesel Locomotive

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 10th October 2008, 09:16
pavorossi pavorossi is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,651
Images: 69
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by david1943 View Post
This is very sad, we in Oz are in the same boat all we do is supply the raw materials
At least you still do that, more than we do anymore. Although, we must be the world leaders when it comes to supplying boxes of fudge at tourist destinations surely, so does fudge making count as a heavy industry?


__________________
Adam
East Lancs TTI
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10th October 2008, 10:47
david1943's Avatar
david1943 david1943 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mornington Peninsula Australia
Posts: 96
Images: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by pavorossi View Post
At least you still do that, more than we do anymore. Although, we must be the world leaders when it comes to supplying boxes of fudge at tourist destinations surely, so does fudge making count as a heavy industry?
Love that one Adam, I guess it depends on how much you eat, if all these problems were not so serious it would be laughable, the way World finance is going at the moment we may all finish up the Creek.

David.

Last edited by david1943; 10th October 2008 at 10:50.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10th October 2008, 16:38
paul miller paul miller is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ilkeston Derbyshire
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
David,
You asked about the British Locomotive Industry, it is now in a small shed in Darlington.
One loco every 18 years!!!!!
John (G)
Brilliant John, but sadly very true.
Paul.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10th October 2008, 16:41
paul miller paul miller is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ilkeston Derbyshire
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by pavorossi View Post
At least you still do that, more than we do anymore. Although, we must be the world leaders when it comes to supplying boxes of fudge at tourist destinations surely, so does fudge making count as a heavy industry?
Some of the fudge I have bought from seaside resorts would qualify for being heavy industry.
Paul.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10th October 2008, 17:19
pavorossi pavorossi is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,651
Images: 69
There are entire streets devoted to it, I think that 90% of the shops along The Shambles in York are fudge shops!
__________________
Adam
East Lancs TTI
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11th July 2009, 18:39
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
After all this talk of fudge it's hard to imagine that this thread started off discussing Freightliner's new diesel loco order from GE in America.
The first photos of the actual loco are now available in this leaflet. If you thought 66's were ugly then take a look at this.
http://www.freightliner.co.uk/filelibrary/PDFs/news/Fact%20Sheet.pdf
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12th July 2009, 15:55
meurglysIII meurglysIII is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: golborne, warrington
Posts: 249
Images: 64
That's one uggly buggly loco.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12th July 2009, 19:47
DSY011's Avatar
DSY011 DSY011 is offline  
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BRISTOL U.K.
Posts: 4,464
Images: 547
I knew there was a reason that I was not keen on Diesel traction. Now I know I was right. What happened to the nice clean lines of the class 37's 40s' 44's and 47's. They looked British and were British.
__________________
The Old Git, Syd
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 13th July 2009, 21:27
Triplex Triplex is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 68
Now, I'm not British. I don't mind the look of 59s and 66s, and I think 58s are ugly. I still say this new one is worse. As with GEs vs. EMDs in North America, it seems GE can't make a passable cab.

But, seriously, I recognize the visibility advantages of this design. Like the 58, a "dogbone" configuration maximizes forward visibility in both directions while allowing some rearward visibility. And the single windshield is obviously best.
__________________
Fan of Conrail... also PRR, Santa Fe, BN and SP, 70s-80s CN, pre-merger-era UP, heavy electric operations in general, DB and DR, Brazilian railroads in general... why bother trying to list them all?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 13th July 2009, 21:57
Baggie Mel's Avatar
Baggie Mel Baggie Mel is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Dibden, Southampton
Posts: 44
Images: 25
Looks like a 58 thats already been in an accident to me. Hope its better for the drivers though !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:50.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.