Welcome to Railway Forum! | |
Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Adam East Lancs TTI |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
David. Last edited by david1943; 10th October 2008 at 10:50. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Paul. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Paul. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
After all this talk of fudge it's hard to imagine that this thread started off discussing Freightliner's new diesel loco order from GE in America.
The first photos of the actual loco are now available in this leaflet. If you thought 66's were ugly then take a look at this. http://www.freightliner.co.uk/filelibrary/PDFs/news/Fact%20Sheet.pdf
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I knew there was a reason that I was not keen on Diesel traction. Now I know I was right. What happened to the nice clean lines of the class 37's 40s' 44's and 47's. They looked British and were British.
__________________
The Old Git, Syd |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Now, I'm not British. I don't mind the look of 59s and 66s, and I think 58s are ugly. I still say this new one is worse. As with GEs vs. EMDs in North America, it seems GE can't make a passable cab.
But, seriously, I recognize the visibility advantages of this design. Like the 58, a "dogbone" configuration maximizes forward visibility in both directions while allowing some rearward visibility. And the single windshield is obviously best.
__________________
Fan of Conrail... also PRR, Santa Fe, BN and SP, 70s-80s CN, pre-merger-era UP, heavy electric operations in general, DB and DR, Brazilian railroads in general... why bother trying to list them all? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|