23:28

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

11 coach pendolino.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 22nd March 2012, 22:40
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
There's a piece in this month's Railway Magazine about this, yes 390054 & 390055 are having to be kept apart, they are not even allowed to pass or enter the same station at the same time. One is diagrammed to be used on London -Manchester via Trent valley and Stoke. The other is on duties between Birmingham and Scotland. Evidently it's all down to the Insurance companies. These sets cost £30 million each and the thought of them both being in an accident and subsequently written off is something the insurance companies don't want to contemplate. The older sets have depreciated in value somewhat so they would not have to pay out so much if one were involved in an accident with a new set. In April a new insurance policy comes into force and the situation will cease.

The above is a paraphrase to the Railway Mag. article, it's on page 9 of the current issue if anyone wants a sneaky read in their local newsagents.

Hope this helps. The whole thing sounds totally DAFT to me.

Regards, 62440.


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22nd March 2012, 22:41
pre65's Avatar
pre65 pre65 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ashen-North Essex/Suffolk borders.
Posts: 3,560
Images: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by keith morgan View Post
Re. Pendolino's. Two questions ---- is it correct that 11 coach Pendo's are not allowed to pass each other? i don't understand why!
I read somewhere it was to do with the insurance company. (may have been Railway Herald)
__________________
Philip.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23rd March 2012, 13:03
6678bjm's Avatar
6678bjm 6678bjm is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chasewater
Posts: 876
Images: 95
Don't know if this post is relevant but this story quoted is found in the April dated issue and seems a bit unlikely to me

Regards
__________________
Bryan

www.chasewaterrailway.co.uk

Last edited by 6678bjm; 23rd March 2012 at 21:14. Reason: Spelling
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 23rd March 2012, 16:44
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
Well done that man! I reckon you've hit the nail on the head there! Getting magazines a month in front of the cover date means we don't think about April Fool jokes at the start of March.

Regards, 62440.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 25th March 2012, 07:20
Madcaravanner's Avatar
Madcaravanner Madcaravanner is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 977
Images: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62440 View Post
There's a piece in this month's Railway Magazine about this, yes 390054 & 390055 are having to be kept apart, they are not even allowed to pass or enter the same station at the same time.


Hope this helps. The whole thing sounds totally DAFT to me.

Regards, 62440.
Just found this thread

Come on guys it's a load of BS
What's NEXT MONTH the mags come out a month early


APRIL FOOLS


__________________
Regards
Gray
The wheelchair Paparazzi

https://www.flickr.com/gp/grays_photos/6P1643
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.