14:42

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Passenger Operations and Observations

Double-Decker Trains

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 16th July 2006, 17:07
patlucas's Avatar
patlucas patlucas is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 18
So the end result was that they didn't do anything and ended-up with a bigger problem to solve now!!!


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16th July 2006, 17:59
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by patlucas
So the end result was that they didn't do anything and ended-up with a bigger problem to solve now!!!
Correct.........and typical of the British attitude towards public transport
John.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16th July 2006, 21:58
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
The main problems are the restrictions imposed by the British loading gauge. It was the passengers who didn't like them because they felt claustraphobic inside them.

The Italian trains for example feel airy and spacious because they are so much bigger.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17th July 2006, 12:39
patlucas's Avatar
patlucas patlucas is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 18
So why was the British loading gauge so small? It is bigger everywhere else in Europe so double-decker trains do not have to be so cramped. In France, they also feel airy and spacious.

Can anybody confirm my impression that the catenary is lower in the UK than in the rest or Europe? If this is the case then we can say goodbye to double-decker trains. I can't see the British goverment putting-up the money for this kind of upgrade. If this is to happen then the passenger will have to foot the bill and that wouldn't be popular at all because fares are much to high anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17th July 2006, 21:34
Shed Cat's Avatar
Shed Cat Shed Cat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 1,100
Images: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by patlucas
So the end result was that they didn't do anything and ended-up with a bigger problem to solve now!!!
No, they went back to "Plan A" and spent billions on extending platforms and signalling etc. You can still see this on many Southern platforms where the last 30m are precast concrete stuck on the end.

To be fair, I think a lot of the infrastructure needed upgrading anyway, but think of the equivalent project today if they decided to make 14-coach trains as the new standard to relieve overcrowding.

One thing they didnt think of in the 1950's was today's alternative solution to overcrowding. i.e. Cut services, shorten trains, and put the fare prices up.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17th July 2006, 21:55
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
We are paying the price for inventing trains in the first place. Much of the present infrastructure was laid out in the 1840-50's!

Countries that followed learn't from our mistakes!

Catenary is lower because the loading gauge is smaller.

The original West Coast Elecifiction was lowered to save the cost of rebuilding all the bridges and enlarging tunnels, which is why many steam engines ended up with yellow stripes on their cab sides.

The bigger engines running on the main line now eg the Duchess have been lowered to work under the wires.

If you compare the width and depth of our canals compared with those on the continent you will find the same thing for the same reason, which is why there is much more commercial traffic on canals on the continent.

We can be very proud of giving the world railways. The downside is our very restricted loading gauge.

Last edited by John H-T; 17th July 2006 at 22:01.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 19th July 2006, 16:32
patlucas's Avatar
patlucas patlucas is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 18
Indeed, the UK did give railways to the world but, unlike the rest of the world, it has not been upgrading them to keep up with demand. So now the railways in the UK are bursting at the seams and it is becoming more and more dificult to find a solutions that will not bring about major disruption.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 7th September 2006, 11:07
patlucas's Avatar
patlucas patlucas is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 18
Hi

In the Metro recently, I read that double-decker trains are back on the agenda. Any comments?

Regards

Patrick
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 7th September 2006, 20:18
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
I haven't heard about that, Patrick.
I hope someone can give us more details.
John.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 8th September 2006, 11:10
patlucas's Avatar
patlucas patlucas is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 18
The BBC website article is here for you all to have a look at.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.