Welcome to Railway Forum! | |
Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
10 years ago now (summer 2000) we went on a 101 dmu out of Glasgow Central to a suburban destination and very soon after that they were withdrawn. If I remember right, they were painted in that rather unimaginative all-over darkish blue colour. Personally I don't have very positive memories of them - noisy, poor performance and stank of diesel fumes - but they're very much part of our railway heritage now.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
http://www.traintesting.com/iris1&2.htm Quote:
http://homepages.tesco.net/~rob.coll...piccadilly.jpg http://www.flickr.com/photos/lastarial/2767172901/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:101692_at_Arley.JPG
__________________
REAL LIFE FACT: 3,000 people die each year putting their trousers on! Well done for making it past that today! |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://daverowland.fotopic.net/p44654411.html |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Now you have got me thinking - back in the times of BR blue, DMUs were blue and the main line Mk II coaches were blue and grey.
Anybody remember the discussion and dis-approval when BR started putting blue and grey on DMUs? The feeling was that blue and grey was appropriate for main line but not for the rocking and rolling of a DMU. If I remember it was the Trans-Pennines sets that first got the blue and grey. I will look up my Railway Worlds to find out if I can find some of the discussion. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I do remember writing down train numbers at Chester in the late 80s, and asked a youngish chap if he'd got the numbers of an old DMU that had just left. "No, I don't bother with them" he replied. "Why not?" says I. "Well, they're not going to be around for long, so it's not worth it" he says. Hmmmm. By the same reasoning, was it worth noting the numbers of class 20, 25, 26, 27, 31, 33, 37, 40, 45, 46, 47, 50, 52, 55, 56, 60, 73, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 90, .... if you see what I mean? Last edited by Dave Rowland; 22nd October 2010 at 08:02. Reason: typo |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|