17:21

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > On-track Machinery

Ballast Tamping Locomotive

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 4th March 2011, 12:58
HM181's Avatar
HM181 HM181 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Mill
Posts: 329
Images: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Preston Pilot 47472 View Post
The results achieved by the tamper on the line at Clitheroe are quite remarkable. We live close to Horrocksford Junction and the heavy cement trains from Castle Cement, which use this stretch of line, appear to have caused the rails to sink quite deep into ballast. To the point where the ballast was covering the sleepers and almost up to rail top level on the outside of the rails. The tamper corrected and realigned this problem within a few minutes.
Speaking of the cement trains, the class 66s which pull them work extremely hard to get them moving off the falling gradient and are most impressive. I would dearly have loved to see and hear a 9F do the same - the pyrotechnics and audio would have been fantastic.
If it was a choice I would use 66's as museum pieces, and bring back the 56/60's as the 66's maybe new but cant pull 38mgrs loaded out of Hunslet East in one go.
The 56/60 had no problems, but that called progress.



Last edited by HM181; 4th March 2011 at 13:26.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21st July 2011, 03:56
saxokid's Avatar
saxokid saxokid is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: wirral
Posts: 438
Images: 171
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by John H-T View Post
We have had a tamper on the EVR all this week to tamp the section from Idridgehay to Duffield (5 miles). It is due to finish to-day. Here are a couple of photos from Wednesday near milepost 136 between Shottle and Hazelwood.
Nice pictures John
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21st July 2011, 22:55
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxokid View Post
Nice pictures John
Thanks Saxokid. The line seems to be holding up quite well.

We have nearly finished other work which HMRI requested to be done this summer, including transposing badly side cut rail on the continuous welded section between Idridgehay and Shottle. We can now transpose 240' lengths of rail (80 meters in new money) in one go! It is amazing what you can do with 8 men, rail turners, crow bars and track jacks. Will post some photos when I have downloaded them.

Best wishes,

John H-T.
__________________
Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.
LMS Patriot Group.
LMS Carriage Association.
Belper Model Railway Group.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22nd July 2011, 21:35
Silver Fox Phil's Avatar
Silver Fox Phil Silver Fox Phil is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 2,001
Images: 195
Nice machine and thanks for posting some pics John H-T.
Does anyone have any video footage to share of one in operation that I would find interesting.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Phil
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22nd July 2011, 23:15
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Transposing 240 feet of rail.

Sadly I don't have any video. It is a facinating process to watch.

As promised here are some photos of transposing 240 feet/80 meter lengths of rail weighing nearly 4 tons, with just rail turners, crow bars, track jacks and 8 men, well 7 while I was taking the photos!

best wishes,

John H-T.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P7200179rf.jpg (111.2 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg P7200180rf.jpg (108.6 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg P7200182rf.jpg (123.9 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg P7200185rf.jpg (187.5 KB, 14 views)
__________________
Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.
LMS Patriot Group.
LMS Carriage Association.
Belper Model Railway Group.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 24th July 2011, 22:55
Silver Fox Phil's Avatar
Silver Fox Phil Silver Fox Phil is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 2,001
Images: 195
Thanks John, good crew working hard be the look of it.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 25th July 2011, 02:38
saxokid's Avatar
saxokid saxokid is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: wirral
Posts: 438
Images: 171
Good team work i see!! great pics.........
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 25th July 2011, 19:33
Ploughman Ploughman is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: York
Posts: 333
Was it long welded rail with joints or CWR Continuous welded rail were you need to stress the track and weld it back in place?
With the curve on the line did you have to install a closure rail to take up the discrepancy in rail length?
__________________
Bryan

http://www.yorkareagroup.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 26th July 2011, 20:20
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Thanks folks for your comments.

We will need to put in a closure rail when we do the last section. We have decided to abandon the continuous welded. To start with it is being plated in 240' lengths and allowed to settle. Then we will cut it into 120' sections.

The cost of maintaining and restressing CWR is proving too high. Cost to do the job we are doing is £3,500. Cost of totally restoring CWR and restressing £10,000 plus and then ongoing maintenance. We have the labour, see photos, but not the money!

Best wishes,

John H-T.
__________________
Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.
LMS Patriot Group.
LMS Carriage Association.
Belper Model Railway Group.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 27th July 2011, 10:10
Silver Fox Phil's Avatar
Silver Fox Phil Silver Fox Phil is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 2,001
Images: 195
Big difference in cost John can understand why you go for the sections rather than the CWR. Anyway I prefer the sound of the bogies giong over the joints as it was before CWR came along!
Keep up the good work to all the crew, thanks
Regards
phil
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.