06:31

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Passenger Operations and Observations

Franchise Reorganisation

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 16th April 2008, 12:58
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by hairyhandedfool View Post
Why MML ever selected those units I will never know, and then to pick a slightly longer 222, with fewer seats per coach, the mind boggles.
Well it's better than TP Express axing a 2 hourly Manchester Airport-Preston-Windermere service to be able to have enough 100mph 3 car 185s to be able to run a 2 hourly Manchester Airport-Preston-Scotland service (which they bidded for), when Virgin previously ran a 2 hourly Manchester Piccadilly-Preston-Scotland service using 125mph 4 car 220s.


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16th April 2008, 13:10
hairyhandedfool hairyhandedfool is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MANCHESTER
Posts: 272
Images: 6
The 185 is certainly not suited to the route but then voyagers were hardly suitable either. My point really was that a route which most associate with 8 coach express trains gets 2 car (latter 3 car) trains for the stoppers and then runs them all the way to Nottingham, only to replace them with the only slightly more suitable Meridians, meaning that the 'Regional Express' service now provided by an Intercity operator is blighted by the 170s.

In reality, which is more suited to 170s, London to Nottingham, or Liverpool to Norwich?
__________________
REAL LIFE FACT: 3,000 people die each year putting their trousers on!

Well done for making it past that today!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16th April 2008, 16:26
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by hairyhandedfool View Post
The 185 is certainly not suited to the route but then voyagers were hardly suitable either. My point really was that a route which most associate with 8 coach express trains gets 2 car (latter 3 car) trains for the stoppers and then runs them all the way to Nottingham, only to replace them with the only slightly more suitable Meridians, meaning that the 'Regional Express' service now provided by an Intercity operator is blighted by the 170s.

In reality, which is more suited to 170s, London to Nottingham, or Liverpool to Norwich?
Voyagers would be better suited to the Manchester to Scotland route if the route went Manchester-Wigan-Preston rather than Manchester-Bolton-Preston.

The longest journey I've done on a 170 is Liverpool to Manchester but I would not have been dissatisified with the quality of the train if I was continuing my journey to Sheffield or Nottingham.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17th April 2008, 07:05
hairyhandedfool hairyhandedfool is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MANCHESTER
Posts: 272
Images: 6
I was on a 170 from Manchester to Peterborough, I will never be again!
The earliest I got a seat was Nottingham and even then it was only the vestibule one. Three coaches on a mid morning saturday service, not enough.

I would rather take the 185 to Leeds before heading south for a similar journey time (from my house).
__________________
REAL LIFE FACT: 3,000 people die each year putting their trousers on!

Well done for making it past that today!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17th April 2008, 10:10
hstudent hstudent is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North West
Posts: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by hairyhandedfool View Post
I was on a 170 from Manchester to Peterborough, I will never be again!
The earliest I got a seat was Nottingham and even then it was only the vestibule one. Three coaches on a mid morning saturday service, not enough.

I would rather take the 185 to Leeds before heading south for a similar journey time (from my house).
You might never be able to again as EMT only use 158s on the Liverpool to Norwich route. EMT do use pairs of 2 car 158s on selected services now.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17th April 2008, 20:48
martin adamson martin adamson is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 0
Images: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by hstudent View Post
FNW using 150s with limited leg room and without catering on Buxton to Manchester to Blackpool services, but using 175s with ample leg room and catering on Manchester Airport to Blackpool services.
Yeah that used to be an odd set of operations (from what I remember there was timetabled a trolley service on one Blackpool-Buxton that left after 17:00, but I don't know if it ever turned up ), but it was like you say, offering a very different service by the same operator. I think the idea of this was FNW's intercity Man Airport to Blackpool, alongside their local stopping service (which ironically went further), but that Man Airport to Blackpool stopped at a lot of stations (over 15 I think), didn't feel like much of an express until it was taken into TPX who altered stopping patterns.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28th July 2008, 08:57
lansley lansley is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chichester
Posts: 5
i think london midland is the most exciting of the new franchises, not only does it have a great name and livery, but there is going to be serious long needed investiment in turbostars to replace sprinters, and desiros to replace class 321 electric units. East Midlands Trains sees little improvement as far as i can see, whilst crosscountry sees downgrading though thats because theres a refusal to add more coaches to voyager units, so you end up taking away much needed facilities (one toilet and the shop)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 28th July 2008, 18:36
martin adamson martin adamson is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 0
Images: 18
I agree, London Midland is a breath of fresh air after the whole Central Trains that was too large.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.