22:32

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

RIP class 37's and 56's!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 5th December 2009, 02:35
Rassy's Avatar
Rassy Rassy is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glastonbury
Posts: 37
RIP class 37's and 56's!

DB Schenker recently put 16 locomotives up for sale. 8 class 37's and 8 class 56's.

I heard today that all 8 class 37's have been purchased by the scrap man (CF Booth). 1 class 56 was purchased by a 'private owner' probably for preservation, while the 7 remaining class 56's were purchased by scrap merchants 'EMR Kingsbury'.

Damn shame.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5th December 2009, 13:56
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Welcome to the Forum Rassy.

I have to say that I think we probably have enough 37s in preservation, much as I love them. The ones now being sold are well used and could be quite costly to keep in working order. The 37/4s still active might be another matter. Big Diesels are expensive to run and not very suitable for many preserved railways. They are also quite heavy on the track!

I do believe that preservation is going to take a hard look at what we keep and what goes for spares/scrap! This applies to ex Barry steam locos as well. Are there some "no hopers" which would be better dismantled for spares?

I would like to see more money going into restoring pre BR coaching stock especially pregrouping wooden bodied coaches at present rotting in sidings at many Heritage Railways.

I will now put on my flack jacket!

Best wishes,

John H-T.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 5th December 2009, 15:51
hughesfowler hughesfowler is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: manchester
Posts: 1
The 37s that were put up for sale were in a very poor state and as much as I love 37s the scrapyard was the best place for them. Many of them had been stripped to provide components for the existing fleet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th December 2009, 18:20
klordger1900's Avatar
klordger1900 klordger1900 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 732
Images: 27
I heard a class 37 at Waltham Cross this morning perhaps on an engineering train? Did anyone actually see what it was?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th December 2009, 05:22
Rassy's Avatar
Rassy Rassy is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glastonbury
Posts: 37
The solitary 56 saved for preservation was 56134 'Blyth Power'.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 6th December 2009, 11:17
ccmmick's Avatar
ccmmick ccmmick is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St Austell
Posts: 1,109
Images: 71
It is a shame to see the 37s go they have been a dam good work horse over the years.
But time moves on cleaner locos more fuel efficient and less maintenance.

ccmmick.
__________________
Sometimes i think to myself
I dont know and other times
I dont know what to think

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 6th December 2009, 16:05
Rassy's Avatar
Rassy Rassy is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Glastonbury
Posts: 37
My great uncle was an engine driver and he said the class 37's were the worst loco's to drive because the visibility when sitting down was really poor. You have to sit bolt upright the whole time just to see out the window.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 6th December 2009, 16:20
Flying Pig Flying Pig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gone
Posts: 322
Images: 3
There's a fair few 37s still out working on the Mainline. I saw a couple of DRS 37s at Selhurst TRSMD a few days ago with the NR measurement train, and there's several of the class being used on ERTMS trials on the Cambrian line, even if they are banana coloured.

Good old English Electric, it always puts a smile on my face when I hear one power away (not like a 66 - that sounds to me like 2 daleks copulating inside a dustbin).

Hey ho.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 6th December 2009, 17:10
Gordon's Avatar
Gordon Gordon is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Alford, Aberdeenshire
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by John H-T View Post
Welcome to the Forum Rassy.

I have to say that I think we probably have enough 37s in preservation, much as I love them. The ones now being sold are well used and could be quite costly to keep in working order. The 37/4s still active might be another matter. Big Diesels are expensive to run and not very suitable for many preserved railways. They are also quite heavy on the track!

I do believe that preservation is going to take a hard look at what we keep and what goes for spares/scrap! This applies to ex Barry steam locos as well. Are there some "no hopers" which would be better dismantled for spares?

I would like to see more money going into restoring pre BR coaching stock especially pregrouping wooden bodied coaches at present rotting in sidings at many Heritage Railways.

I will now put on my flack jacket!

Best wishes,

John H-T.
I completely agree. I don't want to name any particular classes for fear of offending people, but I'm sure we can all think of classes where there are a disproportionate amount preserved, and you think 'Another one? I'd rather see xxxxx' or whatever...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 6th December 2009, 18:21
JEB-245584/2's Avatar
JEB-245584/2 JEB-245584/2 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Trafford
Posts: 659
Images: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon View Post
I completely agree. I don't want to name any particular classes for fear of offending people, but I'm sure we can all think of classes where there are a disproportionate amount preserved, and you think 'Another one? I'd rather see xxxxx' or whatever...
Good point there Gordon but how do you define a no-hoper or a class of loco which has too many examples already saved?
What may seem one too many to some people, is some other individuals or groups personal goal to complete/restore and run.I also think that if it was possible to dispose of any locos in the future most of the funds raised would'nt find their way back into preservation unless they were owned by an actual railway company/society and not like most locos privately owned.

Cheers John
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.