03:58

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > Diesel & Electric > Diesel & Electric Discussion

The return of Diesel hydraulics?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 27th September 2009, 18:23
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
The return of Diesel hydraulics?

This type of loco was not around for very long on the network.
It was around for a bit in the industrial sector but now it is less common.
I beleive that becuase it did not have time to develop.
Could this form of technology be revisited?
I like to beleive it, I mean we could find out that after all the known problems have been solved, it could be more efficient than diesel electrics.
There was a bit more character in the Hymeks and westerns than the diesel electrics, with perhaps the exception of the class 55's.


__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27th September 2009, 21:39
ccmmick's Avatar
ccmmick ccmmick is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St Austell
Posts: 1,109
Images: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam for ever View Post
This type of loco was not around for very long on the network.
It was around for a bit in the industrial sector but now it is less common.
I beleive that becuase it did not have time to develop.
Could this form of technology be revisited?
I like to beleive it, I mean we could find out that after all the known problems have been solved, it could be more efficient than diesel electrics.
There was a bit more character in the Hymeks and westerns than the diesel electrics, with perhaps the exception of the class 55's.
I dont think there were many problems with them they gave years of very good service.
The only thing was that they were non standard to the rest of the country.
I agree with you lovely locos and it would be a treat to see them running again but i dont think that will ever happen.
ccmmick
__________________
Sometimes i think to myself
I dont know and other times
I dont know what to think

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28th September 2009, 17:55
Foxwall Foxwall is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Leicester
Posts: 31
Could some kind person give me an "idiots" guide to how the diesel hydraulic engines worked. I understand that diesel electrics generated electricity to drive the traction motors. What did the diesel hydraulic generate to power their traction motors ?

And am i right in thinking that most DMU's were direct drive diesels ?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th September 2009, 20:37
swisstrains's Avatar
swisstrains swisstrains is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,149
Images: 538
Some of the present day DMU's such as Class 170, 175, 180 and 185 are diesel-hydraulics.
Germany has continued to develop Diesel-hydraulics and this type of loco is quite common in mainland Europe.
__________________
John …….My Railwayforum Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28th September 2009, 21:03
ccmmick's Avatar
ccmmick ccmmick is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St Austell
Posts: 1,109
Images: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxwall View Post
Could some kind person give me an "idiots" guide to how the diesel hydraulic engines worked. I understand that diesel electrics generated electricity to drive the traction motors. What did the diesel hydraulic generate to power their traction motors ?

And am i right in thinking that most DMU's were direct drive diesels ?

Thanks
Hi Foxwall
This might help you
I worked on these locos at St Blazey a beautiful engine but very complex

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_...esel-hydraulic
ccmmick
__________________
Sometimes i think to myself
I dont know and other times
I dont know what to think

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1st October 2009, 13:45
lnwr20's Avatar
lnwr20 lnwr20 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Crewe, Cheshire, UK
Posts: 142
Images: 90
The Diesel -hydraulic was a western design, as usual the Western were doing there own thing not conforming to what the other regions were doing in loco development. An as now has been proved the Diesel-Hydraulic was a poor design otherwise they would still be operating on the mainlines today "Not on preserved lines" or running as excursions with fitter cover just in case they go BANG on the main line but thats just my view.
__________________
Phill LNWR Society Member, Class 60 Group Member. Rail Riders Member & Member os Wrenbury & District Model Railway Group
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 1st October 2009, 14:14
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
Inwr20. The Warships were based on the German V200's I believe. The diesel-hydraulics were just non standard to the rest of the B.R. fleet, all the other regions opted for electric transmission while the erstwhile G.W.R. went on it's own merry way and no-one at the top tried to stop it. The least reliable of the hydraulics seemed to be those built by North British; the class 41's, 43's, and 22's.
Cheers,62440
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st October 2009, 22:51
ccmmick's Avatar
ccmmick ccmmick is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St Austell
Posts: 1,109
Images: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62440 View Post
Inwr20. The Warships were based on the German V200's I believe. The diesel-hydraulics were just non standard to the rest of the B.R. fleet, all the other regions opted for electric transmission while the erstwhile G.W.R. went on it's own merry way and no-one at the top tried to stop it. The least reliable of the hydraulics seemed to be those built by North British; the class 41's, 43's, and 22's.
Cheers,62440
I agree with you the early North British were crap also the 600s
But the 800s and 1000s were good locos they gave very good service.
We had the type 22s at St Blazey fased out in early 70s and replaced by Rats.
ccmmick
__________________
Sometimes i think to myself
I dont know and other times
I dont know what to think

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 2nd October 2009, 17:39
Foxwall Foxwall is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Leicester
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmmick View Post
Hi Foxwall
This might help you
I worked on these locos at St Blazey a beautiful engine but very complex

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_...esel-hydraulic
ccmmick
Thanks rather complex, so basically oil under pressure powered the traction motors.

And to think not so long back i thought all diesel locos were powered like diesel buses or lorries but with bigger engines.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 2nd October 2009, 18:19
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
What about the hymeks?
How has the service they gave?
This type was more of a mixed traffic design.
I agree that the western region had no real interest of the outside world.
It just goes to show that GWR was not prepared to die.
It was not until the closure of swindon that practices faded away.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.