Welcome to Railway Forum! | |
Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Rush hour tube trains in near miss drama
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Would this have been at a diamond crossing?
__________________
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
It would sound like it from the article:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
My Photo's http://www.jasonbrown.fotopic.net/ My Video's http://uk.youtube.com/steamvids |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Either:
a) due to a signalling failure, the signaller authorised the train driver to pass the signal at danger. (This is a regular occurance). Obviously when this takes place you have by definition thrown away the built-in protection of the signalling system. It is conceivable for a signaller to allow a train into a section occupied by another train. b) The train driver passed the signal at danger without authority - which would make it a SPAD The article mentions that they were looking at the actions of the signaller and that he had been removed from duty - so I know where I'd put my money. (Though he has my sympathy, poor b*****. ) c) It might have been a bit of both. If the driver had spadded, the signaller may have have authorised him to move the train afterwards whilst there was another train making a (legitimate) conflicting move. No doubt in time we'll get all the sordid details. I'm just glad the two trains didn't meet !! Last edited by Flying Pig; 2nd April 2009 at 19:43. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|