07:47

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > News and General Discussion > Railway News from around the World

Rush hour tube trains in near miss drama

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 30th March 2009, 20:45
John Hunt's Avatar
John Hunt John Hunt is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Leicester
Posts: 337
Images: 84
Rush hour tube trains in near miss drama

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-...ush_Hour_Drama



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1st April 2009, 18:23
Deathbyteacup's Avatar
Deathbyteacup Deathbyteacup is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 705
Images: 51
Would this have been at a diamond crossing?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd April 2009, 11:46
jay's Avatar
jay jay is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Darlington
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deathbyteacup View Post
Would this have been at a diamond crossing?
It would sound like it from the article:

Quote:
when the Piccadilly line train crossed the track immediately in front of him.
What I want to know is why the train had passed a red signal??

Quote:
which had stopped after going through a red signal
__________________
My Photo's
http://www.jasonbrown.fotopic.net/

My Video's
http://uk.youtube.com/steamvids
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd April 2009, 19:35
Flying Pig Flying Pig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Gone
Posts: 322
Images: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay View Post
What I want to know is why the train had passed a red signal??
Either:

a) due to a signalling failure, the signaller authorised the train driver to pass the signal at danger. (This is a regular occurance). Obviously when this takes place you have by definition thrown away the built-in protection of the signalling system. It is conceivable for a signaller to allow a train into a section occupied by another train.

b) The train driver passed the signal at danger without authority - which would make it a SPAD

The article mentions that they were looking at the actions of the signaller and that he had been removed from duty - so I know where I'd put my money. (Though he has my sympathy, poor b*****. )

c) It might have been a bit of both. If the driver had spadded, the signaller may have have authorised him to move the train afterwards whilst there was another train making a (legitimate) conflicting move.

No doubt in time we'll get all the sordid details. I'm just glad the two trains didn't meet !!

Last edited by Flying Pig; 2nd April 2009 at 19:43.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.