16:14

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Passenger Operations and Observations

Reopening Exeter/Okehampton/Plymouth line

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 9th November 2014, 22:56
paul mercer paul mercer is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: tavistock
Posts: 16
Reopening Exeter/Okehampton/Plymouth line

Re the collapse of the Dawlish line last winter there have been many sugggestions re the various options put forward by Network Rail. The one I have long supported is the reopening of the old Southern line through Okehampton and Tavistock as most of the trackbed is still intact and the costs quoted by Network Rail were considerably cheaper than boring new tunnels under South Devon (which would only save around 6 mins) and it is interesting to note that the Transport Minister went by special train to Okehampton station last week. There has been a lot of talk from people in Plymouth wanting a faster service to London as well as having the GW route electrified (which has been ready dismissed) presumably because electrics and salt water don't mix very well, whereas the Southern route would have no such restrictions if it was decided to electrify that. It seems to me that the route between Exeter and Plymouth does not lend itself to fast running, let alone at 125mph. I believe the average not stop time is around 55 minutes for an HST, a time almost matched by 6024 King Edward 1 in 2002 at 58 mins 6 secs so it would seem that any extra time saving in the future is going to be east of Exeter which may be electrified one day. As I live near Tavistock I have been encouraged by the support for the reopening, but I do have my suspicions that the Government are going to declare that they will only patch up the line at Dawlish and quietly forget that they said anything about looking at alternative options!
What to Forum members think?


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10th November 2014, 13:10
Beeyar Wunby's Avatar
Beeyar Wunby Beeyar Wunby is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NW Norfolk
Posts: 840
Images: 4
Hi Paul, and welcome to the forum.

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul mercer View Post
.....presumably because electrics and salt water don't mix very well, whereas the Southern route would have no such restrictions if it was decided to electrify that.
OHLE can live happily next to the sea, as it does on the ECML. But it's probably true to say that a heavy onshore storm throwing thousands of gallons of salty water over the 25,000 volt line could cause it to trip out, or at least provide a very entertaining lightning display ! I've seen some very strange things occur with the high voltages carried by the catenarys ( including the "The St Chad bridge Exploding Pigeon Effect").

Quote:
.... but I do have my suspicions that the Government are going to declare that they will only patch up the line at Dawlish and quietly forget that they said anything about looking at alternative options!
Yes I'd put my money on it. Most of us here aren't taken in by ministers' promises... I remember John Prescott's words after the Clapham disaster - we must have Automatic Train Protection "at any cost". Yeah right

BW
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10th November 2014, 13:43
41225 41225 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Thailand
Posts: 54
Images: 49
Shame about the airport at Plymouth though!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11th November 2014, 18:24
paul mercer paul mercer is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: tavistock
Posts: 16
Thanks for your replies, a picture on local news today showed an HST taking what looked like a very heavy shower!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11th November 2014, 18:30
paul mercer paul mercer is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: tavistock
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by 41225 View Post
Shame about the airport at Plymouth though!!!!
True, but the runway was just too short to take anything larger than a Dash 7 and even then it was full power on take off and maximum brakes on landing to avoid ending up on the road. People also complained about the noise, i did see a small jet from the Royal flight take off one day, I'll bet that gave the neighbours somthing to moan about!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th November 2014, 13:17
41225 41225 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Thailand
Posts: 54
Images: 49
I used the airport for work from 1978 until 2000 when I moved abroad.In 2011 I came on holiday and after a 12 hour flight got on a train at reading and I and my wife had to stand in the corridor opposite the toilet all the way to Plymouth as it was jammed packed with what seemed students!Open the airport again please ,just compulsory purchase a few houses and nock them down ,that should do it.Back to the RAIL Journey ,cant health &safety do anything about the number of people that have to stand?I mean in a sudden braking a lot of people would be thrown forward and a lot injured .
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th November 2014, 15:07
Beeyar Wunby's Avatar
Beeyar Wunby Beeyar Wunby is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NW Norfolk
Posts: 840
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by 41225 View Post
....cant health &safety do anything about the number of people that have to stand?I mean in a sudden braking a lot of people would be thrown forward and a lot injured .
This question gets asked a lot. It's not easy finding a solution.

At least at the moment you have the option of squeezing into a standing space.

For example, if the TOC policy was...."You can buy a ticket from us, but it's first come/first served on the train. We only allow 20 people to stand in a carriage", then you could pay your money and maybe not be allowed on a train for hours.

There's no obvious answer to the desperate overcrowding....and all the while politicians are trying to con us that having immigrants streaming into the country is good for us.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th November 2014, 20:42
ianrail ianrail is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Reading
Posts: 327
Paul,
I would love to see the Tavistock line reopened and would hope to be one of the early passengers on the reopened line but, as other members have written, we rely on politicians' promises and we know how much they're worth.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13th November 2014, 15:24
Tony Tony is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Guardamar del Segura, Spain.
Posts: 1,185
Images: 9
Wasn't the Tavistock line mainly single track with passing places and single line tunnels? How much would it cost to rebuild it to modern standards as a double track line which is needed? With our wonderful dithery politicians with their lightening quick decision making, how long would it be before completion? (After the requisite planning enquiries and judicial reviews).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13th November 2014, 18:06
pre65's Avatar
pre65 pre65 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ashen-North Essex/Suffolk borders.
Posts: 3,560
Images: 93
More disruption at Dawlish.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-30040238
__________________
Philip.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.