20:40

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > News and General Discussion > Railway News from around the World

Bridge the gap

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 31st May 2013, 21:27
Silver Fox Phil's Avatar
Silver Fox Phil Silver Fox Phil is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 2,001
Images: 195
Bridge the gap

Great news from the Great Central Railway, they have agreed a partnership with Network Rail to bridge the gap and have began the process of raising the first million pounds to get the bridge sections in. A target date of the end of 2014 has been given for the bridge sections to be in place.
You can read all about it at www.gcrailway.co.uk/unify/
Our good member MHL has uploaded a photo in the gallery that is an interesting old shot of the bridge as it used to be. We can have that again sooner rather than later. I will be making my first small contribution this week, and as they say every pound received is a pound less to find!!
A very excited Silver Fox!!!
Cheers
Phil


__________________
Member of the LMS Patriot Project
Member of the GCR railway
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31st May 2013, 21:58
Madcaravanner's Avatar
Madcaravanner Madcaravanner is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire
Posts: 977
Images: 140
Last visit to the site for 2 weeks as we are away but it's a shame that the bridge over the A61 bypass at Chesterfield is no use (it's single track) it isn't in use yet has to be maintained so why not move it and it's cheaper than a new bridge

just a thought shame no one will do it
__________________
Regards
Gray
The wheelchair Paparazzi

https://www.flickr.com/gp/grays_photos/6P1643
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31st May 2013, 22:33
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Thanks for posting! I'm very happy to hear this as to be honest I was having doubts.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1st June 2013, 11:21
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
Good News. Thanks for letting us know Phil..

Best wishes,

John H-T.
__________________
Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.
LMS Patriot Group.
LMS Carriage Association.
Belper Model Railway Group.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1st June 2013, 15:56
draximus's Avatar
draximus draximus is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 195
Images: 16
Just seen this story being reported on BBC news http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-22728920
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1st June 2013, 17:19
Ploughman Ploughman is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: York
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madcaravanner View Post
Last visit to the site for 2 weeks as we are away but it's a shame that the bridge over the A61 bypass at Chesterfield is no use (it's single track) it isn't in use yet has to be maintained so why not move it and it's cheaper than a new bridge

just a thought shame no one will do it
Well they are recycling 2 old bridges displaced from the works at Reading.
These had to be moved as part of the renewal works so why not leave the A61 as a bridge in the "Bank" for someone else.
The new bridge will also be single track only.
__________________
Bryan

http://www.yorkareagroup.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd June 2013, 18:38
Silver Fox Phil's Avatar
Silver Fox Phil Silver Fox Phil is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 2,001
Images: 195
Unfortunately Bryan, it has to be single track as I believe there are a number of issues regarding this. One being cost of course and the fact that we have two bridge sections ready to go has saved a massive amount if cash. The embankment is also an issue due to the company Percy Sparks having land so close to the original site of the old embankment, and there is less width to play with resulting in a single track. With today's modern technology it will be possible to reinstate a much reduced width of embankment. So as far as I am aware this section will be always single track. Having said that at least the ambition to join up the two sections of the GCR is now on target for completion. It also gives access to the main line and that too is a real bonus.
All the best
Phil
__________________
Member of the LMS Patriot Project
Member of the GCR railway
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 3rd June 2013, 11:04
draximus's Avatar
draximus draximus is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 195
Images: 16
Single track running over this bridge isn't a real problem, it's just a matter of running to timetable and reliable signalling and point switching I would presume?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 3rd June 2013, 12:35
boilersuit's Avatar
boilersuit boilersuit is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moved again! Back in Kent!!
Posts: 1,214
Images: 99
The single track in itself isn't a problem; every other preserved standard gauge railway in the UK is almost entirely single track. It's just that the GCR prides itself on being the country's only double-track preserved railway, and being forced to accept this section of single track must be tad irritating for them!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 3rd June 2013, 17:06
Silver Fox Phil's Avatar
Silver Fox Phil Silver Fox Phil is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 2,001
Images: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by boilersuit View Post
The single track in itself isn't a problem; every other preserved standard gauge railway in the UK is almost entirely single track. It's just that the GCR prides itself on being the country's only double-track preserved railway, and being forced to accept this section of single track must be tad irritating for them!
Also bear in mind that the whole of the GCR north is also single track! I believe that wont change either. However who knows what the long term future will bring. What I do know is that the first target needs to be achieved before they even think about the other issues. Exciting times
All the best
Phil
__________________
Member of the LMS Patriot Project
Member of the GCR railway
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.