22:47

Welcome to Railway Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to Railway Forum, a dedicated community for railway and train enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   Railway Forum > General Railway Discussion > Light Rail and Metros

Bridging the gap at Loughborough

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 4th November 2010, 08:29
wyvern's Avatar
wyvern wyvern is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Next to Owd George's last railway
Posts: 605
Bridging the gap at Loughborough

New £15m plan for East Midlands heritage rail link

Fresh plans are being made to rebuild the bridge at Loughborough to link the two bits of the Great Central Railway.

A company has been formed.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th November 2010, 23:04
John H-T's Avatar
John H-T John H-T is offline
Station Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,351
Images: 528
There was quite a long report on the project on "East Midlands Today" yesterday (Wednesday). If you didn't see it it may be available on i player.

Best wishes,

John H-T
__________________
Ecclesbourne Valley Railway.
LMS Patriot Group.
LMS Carriage Association.
Belper Model Railway Group.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7th November 2010, 14:24
ianrail ianrail is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Reading
Posts: 327
This will be great news if it happens but an obvious question - why will it cost such a phenomenal amount of money???

A while ago ATOC published a request for comments on reopening certain closed stations on main and secondary lines. One was Clay Cross in Derbyshire. The proposed site was south rather than north of the original junction but at least this meant it would only be a simple two platform affair. The estimated cost? £3million.

The Victorians got a gang of men to build a real station, rather than a modern bus shelter affair, for a tiny fraction of that sort of money in real terms. Now we don't seem able to do anything without a vast team of people in offices doing studies and loads of managers in yellow jackets standing around on site checking that thousands of directives are being adhered to.

I won't go ranting on for ever but can anyone see a way out of this wasteland of expense so that we can do things safely, cheaply and quickly again?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th November 2010, 17:51
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Well perhaps it's better to be safe than sorry. The first Tay bridge was a great example of just that and look what happened.

This, as I understand it, will be more than a heritage railway, but a commuter line too and heavey freight carrier. I have long supported the idea that heritage railways could well do that so this is a step in the right direction. The gap being bridged shall not be along the lines of modern rubbish that plagues our country, but viaducts of blue engineers bricks and stations and track of a decent standard, or so railway publications would have us believe. I trust their judgement.
Rail Magazine has commented on the subject, and that must be true seeign as their managing editor is the project Chairman Nigel Harris!
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8th November 2010, 14:43
ACE's Avatar
ACE ACE is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Penzance,Cornwall
Posts: 469
Images: 1350
Really hope it happens, will be a 'fine' railway when it does, but these prices being quoted, not just on the GCR but the railway in general are outrageous to say the least
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8th November 2010, 16:02
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
As usual, some journo has taken the top price from what was originally quoted as "£10-15 Million pounds" and run with it as the headline. If you read back through the story elsewhere, a figure of Seven million was quoted.

Regards, 62440.

Last edited by 62440; 8th November 2010 at 16:05.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8th November 2010, 20:36
Bubblewrap's Avatar
Bubblewrap Bubblewrap is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Loughborough(Twinned with Legoland)
Posts: 1,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by steam for ever View Post
Well perhaps it's better to be safe than sorry. The first Tay bridge was a great example of just that and look what happened.

This, as I understand it, will be more than a heritage railway, but a commuter line too and heavey freight carrier. I!

Commuter line I think not!.
The line will only run from Ruddington(3 miles south of Nottingham City Centre) to Birstall(Leicester North) (2 Miles North of Leicester City Centre)
Loughborough Central station is about a mile from the centre of Loughborough & even further from the main industrial estates.
__________________
Either he's dead or my watch has stopped.
Groucho Marx
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 8th November 2010, 20:47
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
And on the opposite side of town to the university, which claims to be the town's largest employer........

Regards, 62440.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 8th November 2010, 21:46
steam for ever's Avatar
steam for ever steam for ever is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 2,238
Images: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblewrap View Post
Commuter line I think not!.
The line will only run from Ruddington(3 miles south of Nottingham City Centre) to Birstall(Leicester North) (2 Miles North of Leicester City Centre)
Loughborough Central station is about a mile from the centre of Loughborough & even further from the main industrial estates.
In this months (soon to be last months) steam railway publications the railway eventually wishes to extend north as far as popssible to link up with the proposed tram route, which could techincally make it work.
Extending south as far as the space centre would also equal things out.
GCR(N) already carries freight from East Leake and the mountsorrel branch is proposed to be used once more to relieve pressure on the Midland Mainline). It is this contract that is hoped might fund part of the project.
Chester station is outside the city centre that it serves, but a free bus link to the centre operates every few minutes. Perhaps thats an option at Loughborough.
__________________
"We can pay our debt to the past by putting the future in debt to us..."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8th November 2010, 22:05
62440 62440 is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Loughborough.
Posts: 1,927
Images: 332
Free? In Loughborough? Hah! The only thing free around this town is the air that we breathe, but even that ain't too clean!

Regards, 62440.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.